[Reprint of: Severe pre-eclampsia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French Society of anesthesiology and intensive care (SFAR) and the French College of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF)]. / Republication de : recommandations formalisées d'experts. Prise en charge de la patiente avec une pré-éclampsie sévère­RFE communes Société française d'anesthésie-réanimation (SFAR)­Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CGNOF).

OBJECTIVE: To provide national guidelines for the management of women with severe preeclampsia. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict of interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized. METHODS: The last SFAR and CNGOF guidelines on the management of women with severe preeclampsia was published in 2009. The literature is now sufficient for an update. The aim of this expert panel guidelines is to evaluate the impact of different aspects of the management of women with severe preeclampsia on maternal and neonatal morbidities separately. The experts studied questions within 7 domains. Each question was formulated according to the PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) model and the evidence profiles were produced. An extensive literature review and recommendations were carried out and analyzed according to the GRADE® methodology. RESULTS: The SFAR/CNGOF experts panel provided 25 recommendations: 8 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±), 9 have a moderate level of evidence (GRADE 2±), and for 7 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. No recommendation was provided for 3 questions. After one scoring round, strong agreement was reached between the experts for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There was strong agreement among experts who made 25 recommendations to improve practices for the management of women with severe preeclampsia.

[Patient's experience of topical anesthesia by lidocaine vaginal gel for oocyte retrieval]. / Anesthésie topique par gel de lidocaïne intravaginal pour ponction ovocytaire : retour d'expérience.

A recent adverse effect of a paracervical block (cardiac arrest) occurred during an oocyte retrieval (OR), forcing us to reconsider our pain management during OR. Since then, we decided to use intravaginal lidocaine gel as analgesia during OR. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pain during OR after intravaginal lidocaine gel analgesia and to evaluate the motivations of women choosing this technique. METHODS: A monocentric observational study was performed on 200 patients. Pain was measured using a numeric pain scale during and after oocyte retrieval. The tolerance of the procedure was evaluated through a patient questionnaire. RESULTS: Median maximal pain was 5±2.3 (0-10) per-retrieval and 3±2.2 (0-10) post-retrieval. The procedure was considered bearable by 85.5% of the patients and 81.5% of them would choose this method in case of new oocyte retrieval. No adverse effect occurred during the study. CONCLUSION: The use of intravaginal lidocaine gel seems an acceptable analgesia alternative during oocyte retrieval.

[Airway management in obstetrics]. / Gestion des voies aériennes en obstétrique.

OBJECTIVE: Reviewing problems related to the airway management in obstetrics, taking into account the recent evolutions of the anaesthetic practices in obstetrics. DATA SOURCES: A review of the literature in English and French was performed in the Pumed database in April 2010. The first research used the following MeshTerms: "Anesthesia, Obstetrical" [Mesh] AND "Intubation, Intratracheal" [Mesh]. Complementary research used alone or in combination the following keywords: difficult tracheal intubation; failed tracheal intubation; airway; prediction of difficult tracheal intubation; maternal mortality; maternal morbidity; liability; aspiration pneumonia and obstetrical anesthesia. STUDY SELECTION: All the publications were retained excluding the correspondence. DATA EXTRACTION: Data analysis for the airway management in obstetrics, the prediction of difficult intubation, the prevention of pulmonary inhalation of gastric fluid, but also on maternal morbi-mortality in link with general anesthesia in obstetrics. DATA SYNTHESIS: Airway management in obstetrics remains a true challenge for various reasons. The physiological and anatomical modifications related to pregnancy are responsible for a faster hypoxemia, a reduction of the diameter of the pharyngolaryngal tract, as well as an increase of the risk of inhalation of gastric contents after 16 weeks of amenorrhea. The emergency or extreme emergency context and the presence of diseases like obesity or preeclampsia raise the risks of difficulties with airway management. The logical evolution of the practices, with the considerable rise of the regional anesthesia/analgesia limits the training and the maintenance of competences for intratracheal intubation in obstetrics. The training per simulation appears particularly interesting on the subject and this approach needs to be developed. The literature indicates that the incidence of difficult intubation is of one per 30. The impossible intubation is one per 280 in obstetrics, eight times greater than in the general population. No criterion of difficult intubation is sufficiently predictive alone. In obstetrics as in other contexts, the association of several criteria will permit to anticipate a difficult intubation. There is a worsening of the Mallampati during the pregnancy and during labour. To limit the risk of a difficult management of the airway in obstetrics, it will be paramount and capital, in addition to give priority to the regional anaesthesia/analgesia each time possible, to perform a careful and repeated evaluation of the predictive criteria of difficult intubation or ventilation. The inhalation of gastric fluid will systematically be prevented. The adapted material and algorithms for difficult intubation must be available in the labour wards. In case of a difficult intubation during an emergency caesarean section, the SFAR algorithms must be applied. In case of a "cannot intubate can ventilate situation", the possibility of carrying on the Caesarean maintaining the Sellick manoeuvre should be considered. The place of the laryngoscopy assisted by videolaryngoscope in this context clearly remains to be defined. Even if in the literature some cases of successful intubation through these devices suggest an interest, there is a clear deviance between the guidelines and the practices concerning general anaesthesia performed at the end of the labour. Indeed they should be systematically performed with rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation. A reflexion on this theme is necessary in order to grant the practices to the recommendations.

An observational study of factors leading to difficulty in resident anaesthesiologists identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.

BACKGROUND: Multiple attempts at needle placement for neuraxial block may cause patient discomfort, a higher incidence of spinal haematomas, postdural puncture headache and nerve trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors predicting difficult epidural analgesia for inexperienced residents. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, conducted in a teaching hospital, four anaesthesiology residents without prior experience in obstetric anaesthesia performed all epidural procedures. A difficult epidural was defined as a need for more than one attempt at catheter placement. The following patient data were recorded: body mass index, abdominal circumference (classified as <105 or ≥ 105 cm), ability to palpate anatomical landmarks and spinal abnormality. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve pregnant women in labour were recruited. Residents achieved successful cannulation of the epidural space in 74% of attempts. Factors associated with difficult epidural placement in the univariate analysis were body mass index > 30 kg/m(2), an abdominal circumference > 105 cm, inability to palpate spinous processes and spinal abnormality. With the exception of abdominal circumference, all factors were independently predictive of difficult placement in the multivariate analysis with spinal abnormality being the most significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: For residents with no prior experience in obstetric anaesthesia, the most reliable factor in predicting difficult epidural cannulation was spinal abnormality.

Mallampati class changes during pregnancy, labour, and after delivery: can these be predicted?

BACKGROUND: An increase in Mallampati class is associated with difficult laryngoscopy in obstetrics. The goal of our study was to determine the changes in Mallampati class before, during, and after labour, and to identify predictive factors of the changes. METHODS: Mallampati class was evaluated at four time intervals in 87 pregnant patients: during the 8th month of pregnancy (T(1)), placement of epidural catheter (T(2)), 20 min after delivery (T(3)), and 48 h after delivery (T(4)). Factors such as gestational weight gain, duration of first and second stages of labour, and i.v. fluids administered during labour were evaluated for their predictive value. Mallampati classes 3 and 4 were compared for each time interval. Logistic regression was used to test the association between each factor and Mallampati class evolution. RESULTS: Mallampati class did not change for 37% of patients. The proportion of patients falling into Mallampati classes 3 and 4 at the various times of assessment were: T(1), 10.3%; T(2), 36.8%; T(3), 51.7%; and T(4), 20.7%. The differences in percentages were all significant (P<0.01). None of the evaluated factors was predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of Mallampati classes 3 and 4 increases during labour compared with the pre-labour period, and these changes are not fully reversed by 48 h after delivery. This work confirms the absolute necessity of examining the airway before anaesthetic management in obstetric patients.